﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>InstantForum.NET / Procurement / Procurement / Quality Improvement  / Eligible Death determination / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>InstantForum.NET</description><link>http://www.natco1.org/Forum/InstantForum414/</link><webMaster>forums@instantasp.co.uk</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 05:51:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Eligible Death determination</title><link>http://www.natco1.org/Forum/InstantForum414/Topic139-21-1.aspx</link><description>Jan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have built a questionaire into our data structure.  It will help us answer the questions about our referrals.  Of course this is imperfect and some referrals are then screened manually by a group.  We used to meet weekly, but now we meet bi-weekly.  Seems to work well for us.</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:32:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>John Belcher</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Eligible Death determination</title><link>http://www.natco1.org/Forum/InstantForum414/Topic139-21-1.aspx</link><description>test post please ignore.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:20:50 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Alison Smith</dc:creator></item><item><title>Eligible Death determination</title><link>http://www.natco1.org/Forum/InstantForum414/Topic139-21-1.aspx</link><description>We are trying to set quality process to ensure the status for all referrals is jointly determined and that each designation of status is correct. I hope to hear from someone that has a process in place.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone think it is needed? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The OPO Committee for UNOS is proposing a quality review process.</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:11:21 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jan Finn</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>
